From the category archives:

Investment Strategy

Silver Is Still a Bargain for Long-Term Investors

by Michael Myers on November 4, 2009

Below are some reasons that people I know are holding gold’s little brother, silver.

Link: Invest in Silver Over Gold – Seeking Alpha

As we get closer to the day inflation kicks into full force, it is worth noting some common gold:silver ratios. History has more or less showed us that the historical ratio has averaged between 20:1 – 25:1 (depending on the measured time horizon). I personally like to break it down using different ratios for periods of low to moderate inflation and high and double digit rates of inflation. As a rule of thumb for times of low to moderate rates of inflation (below 5 or 6%), I use a ratio between 45:1- 55:1. During times of high to double digit inflation (late 70′s style) I revert back to the historical ratios between 15:1-30:1. Given the current low level of “headline inflation” (which is nonsense anyway), which has to inevitably rise over the coming decade, silver is very attractive on the gold:silver ratio, currently at 64.36. Though inflation is said to be “very low” (according to the governments convoluted measure), my expectation for it rise sharply over the coming years, makes silver an absolute bargain.

Take a conservative estimate of the future gold price when inflation is in full force, say $1300/oz, silver using a ratio between 25:1 to 40:1, would give you a price somewhere between $32.5 and $52.5. It need not even be take that far to see the price appreciation potential. Assume the price of gold remains at $1060/oz throughout the time when inflation plagues consumer prices, silver should still be between $26.5-$42, which is a substantial rise on a percentage basis. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Accumulating Wealth for Retirement

by Michael Myers on October 9, 2009

In this blog post by John Michael Greer, the importance of long-term investing in real assets becomes evident . Excerpts below.

Link: The Archdruid Report: The Metastasis of Money.

If economists took a wider view of the history of their discipline than they generally do, they might have noticed that what most of them consider a fundamental feature of all economies worth studying – the centrality of money – is actually a unique feature of an economic era defined by cheap abundant energy. Since the fossil fuels that made that era possible are being extracted at a pace many times the rate at which new supplies are being discovered, current assumptions about the role of money in society may be in for a series of unexpected revisions.

In an ironic way, this process of revision may be fostered by the antics of the world’s industrial nations as they try to forestall the Great Recession by spending money they don’t have. The economic crisis that gripped the world in 2008 was primarily driven by a drastic mismatch between money and wealth. When the price of a rundown suburban house zoomed from $75,000 to $575,000, for example, the change marked a distortion in the yardstick rather than any actual increase in the wealth being measured. That distortion caused every economic decision based on it – for example, a buyer’s willingness to go over his head into debt to buy the house, or a bank’s willingness to lend money on the basis of imaginary equity – to suffer similar distortions. Now that the yardsticks have snapped back to something like their proper length, the results of the distortion have to be cleared out of the economy if the amount of money in the system is once again to reflect the actual amount of wealth.

Yet this is exactly what governments and businesses are doing their level best to forestall. Governments are scrambling to prop up economic activity at a pace the real wealth of their societies can no longer support; banks and businesses are doing everything in their power to divert attention from the fact that a great many of the financial assets propping up their balance sheets were never worth anything in the first place and now, if possible, are worth even less. Both are doing so by the simple expedient of spending money they don’t have. As government deficits worldwide spin out of control and the total notional value of the world’s derivatives market climbs steadily above one quadrillion dollars, the decoupling of money from wealth is even more extreme than it was at the height of the real estate bubble.

{ 0 comments }

Is it denial or reality? Apparently the stock market rebound has convinced many investors that the financial crisis was a temporary setback. The results of a survey are described below.

If these investors continue to maintain a buy-and-hold mindset, with no downside protection, they could suffer significant losses again if the amazing 2009 rally is hit by a substantial correction.

Link: Investors Brushing off Key Lessons from Financial Crisis: Business Wire Business News: AZ – MSN Money.

Old Habits Die Hard: Surveyed investors have made no adjustments to their visions of a comfortable retirement…

78% of investors expect their standard of living in retirement to be the same or better than it is now 80% believe they have planned for the future and are confident they will have a secure retirement …and once again are depending on strong stock returns to fund these retirement dreams

Nearly half of investors (48%) continue to rely on equities as the foundation of their retirement portfolios 74% say it is likely the stock market “will bounce back and restore” any portfolio losses Overall, respondents believe a 9% annual mean return is a reasonable expectation for retirement planning Investors counting on a “healthy” retirement

77% of all respondents expect to have “better than average health” throughout retirement 61% have never accounted for health care costs in their retirement planning Investors admit they don’t know enough and are looking to advisors for help

72% want to know more about generating sustainable retirement income More than half (55%) agree that it’s more important than ever to work with a financial advisor Despite the most tumultuous year for investors since the Great Depression, Americans appear unfazed and continue to have high hopes for retirement, according to the results of research released here today by Allianz Global Investors, a leading global investment management firm. But they may need a more realistic approach to retirement planning and investing if their expectations are to be met.

A key finding of the survey is that as stocks have regained their vigor, so has typical American optimism. Although investors say they lost an average 30% of their retirement savings at the bottom, they are nonetheless overwhelmingly positive about the outlook for their retirements. A large majority (71%) of those surveyed believe the situation will turn around and they will have a great retirement. And nearly 80% say they are at least somewhat confident they’ll have the money they need when they want to retire. Furthermore, more than 60% believe that the market dislocation is a “temporary downturn and things will eventually go back to normal.” This refusal to learn from the experience may lead to problems down the line.

“Despite this refreshing optimism, tremendous damage has been done and Americans now have a lot less accumulated for retirement than they did even a few short years ago,” said Brian Gaffney, CEO of Allianz Global Investors Distributors. “Our survey reveals a need for all of us to honestly reassess our vision of retirement and to develop realistic and sustainable retirement savings models. It’s important that we take to heart the lessons learned during this financial crisis and make small changes now to improve our likelihood for a secure retirement in the future.”

The survey was conducted online by Harris Interactive within the United States between July 27 and August 10, 2009, among a nationwide cross section of 1,013 pre-retired household financial decision makers aged 30 or older with at least $250,000 in investable assets. Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the U.S. adult population. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.

One Year Later: Lesson (Not) Learned #1 – Stock Market Turnaround to Fund My Retirement Dreams

Despite their “up-close” encounters with market volatility, investors remain confident that the equity markets will soon get back to normal, providing them with the money they need to retire as planned – and this confidence may be keeping them from taking necessary steps to meet their goals.

Nearly half of all investors surveyed (48%) are relying on stocks as the foundation of their retirement portfolios, and approximately four in ten Baby Boomers (43%) and mature Americans (40%) who are quickly approaching retirement say that the stock market is the foundation of their portfolios. Surprisingly, 21% of mature investors – who are primarily over 65 years old – say they have 91-100% of their employer-sponsored plans invested in stocks.

“The traditional approach to retirement planning that is heavily weighted to stocks may expose investors to increased volatility, making it potentially more difficult to cover basic spending,” said Mr. Gaffney. “Investors need to establish a floor for minimum, ‘must-have’ retirement expenses, and then anchor that part of their portfolios with a conservative strategy designed to prevent irrecoverable losses. That will increase the likelihood of enjoying the full benefit of other investments for their ‘want-to-haves.’ Without that anchor, however, baseline needs like day-to-day expenses and healthcare may be at risk.”

Given this reliance primarily on equities to fund their retirement dreams, it’s no surprise that investors’ high hopes are underpinned by some optimistic assumptions about the equity markets. According to the survey, investors are counting on a rebound: 74% think it’s likely that the “stock market will bounce back and restore any losses” in their portfolios.

One Year Later:Lesson (Not) Learned #2 – Reversion to the Same Old Mean

Human behavior is hard to change. Despite massive declines in wealth over the past year, investors continue to rely on conventional investment and retirement planning assumptions. The mean expected average annual rate of return investors use in planning for retirement is 9% and a large majority (81%) is confident they’ll get their expected rate of return with their current asset allocation.

Investors continue to hold fast to conventional wisdom about retirement planning. Seventy percent believe that “buy and hold” is the path to success and more than half (56%) say that historical performance is a reliable predictor of future success. Despite the failure of many traditional strategies to withstand the crisis, nearly half of investors (48%) think that a 60/40 stock-to-bond split is the model portfolio allocation.

“While it’s highly unusual for all major asset classes to fall at once, severe tail events – those improbable events that cause significant adverse portfolio effects – occur more frequently than many people realize,” said Mr. Gaffney. “We believe that now is the time, while the downturn is still front of mind, for investors to take a closer look at their asset allocation and to consider alternative assets like commodities and Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities or TIPS that, unlike stocks and bonds, positively correlate with inflation and help lower overall portfolio risk.”

One Year Later:Lesson (Not) Learned #3 – Inflation Is Not a Risk, and Cash and Stocks Protect Against That, Anyway

Whatever fears investors have about meeting their retirement goals are tied closely to market performance, with investors ranking the financial markets as the biggest threat to a secure retirement. Indeed, they identify the impact of the economic crisis as an area they should know more about.

The threat of inflation, however, is much lower on the list of concerns for investors. Only 9% of investors rank inflation as the #1 factor threatening their retirement and perhaps more significant, there is an apparent lack of understanding about this risk on the part of investors. In fact, while 73% of investors say they factor inflation into their retirement planning, 45% of those surveyed couldn’t even venture a guess about an inflation rate for planning purposes.

Eighty percent of investors report taking actions to protect their portfolios against inflation, with saving more money being the number one action (43%), followed closely by investing in stocks or stock funds (39%). The vast majority of investors have overlooked “real return” assets like commodities and TIPS, which are only used in 12% and 9% of retirement portfolios, respectively.

“Inflation may be the single biggest risk to sustaining a reasonable lifestyle in retirement,” said Mr. Gaffney. “While there is a widespread belief that stocks are an adequate hedge against inflation, that has not always been the case. We believe the best way to protect against unexpected upticks in inflation is by maintaining exposure to real return assets such as TIPS, real estate and commodities.”

One Year Later:Lesson (Not) Learned #4 – Saving for a “Healthy” Retirement

With health care reform dominating the dialogue in Washington, it is more important than ever for investors to factor these costs into their retirement plans. However, the survey reveals that investors haven’t fully considered the impact of health care costs on their retirements. While 64% of investors say covering health care costs is a “must-have” in their retirement vision, 61% have never accounted for them in their retirement planning – including 62% of Baby Boomers who are on the fringe of retirement. Defying statistical possibility, a large majority ? 77% — of all respondents expect to have “better than average health” throughout retirement.

“It’s tough to confront the possibility of deteriorating health, let alone how to pay for it,” Mr. Gaffney said. “But reform notwithstanding, health care costs are likely to remain considerable for most retirees, as Americans enjoy ever longer and more active retirements. Ignoring these expenses in a retirement plan is like buying a beach house without storm insurance. Eventually, you’re probably going to take a hit, and the consequences might be devastating.”

And…One Year Later:Lesson LEARNED #1 – Investors Want to Learn More, Value Professional Help

Encouragingly, despite their high level of confidence and general optimism, investors want to learn more about a wide variety of issues related to retirement planning and are looking to financial advisors for help.

Seventy-two percent would like to learn more about the best ways to generate income in retirement, 71% said they should know more about anticipating health care costs in retirement, and 62% want help ensuring they don’t outlive their assets. Overall, more than half (55%) agree that it’s more important than ever to work with a financial advisor.

{ 1 comment }

Deflation, Inflation, Paper Currencies, and Gold

by Michael Myers on September 7, 2009

John Mauldin provides some insight into the muddy economic forces that dominate the financial arena in 2009. Lessons from the past do not fit perfectly, so we must listen to wise and objective people to give us some perspective in investing our retirement money. Excerpts below.

Link: The Elements of Deflation - John Mauldin’s Thoughts from the Frontline

Deflation is a major economic game changer…. We face the deflation of the Depression era, and central bankers of the world are united in opposition….  If we don’t have a problem with inflation in the future, we are going to have far worse problems to deal with.

Saint Milton Friedman taught us that inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. That is, if the central bank prints too much money, inflation will ensue. And that is true, up to a point. A central bank, by printing too much money, can bring about inflation and destroy a currency, all things being equal. But that is the tricky part of that equation, because not all things are equal. The pieces of the puzzle can change shape. When the elements of deflation combine in the right order, the central bank can print a boatload of money without bringing about inflation. And we may now be watching that combination come about.

Avoid Big Losses!
If you lose 50%, you must gain 100% to get back to even! :-(
However, if you lose 20%, you must only gain 25% to recover.
Prevent Big Losses eBook

For instance, inflation always seems to be accompanied by higher wages. That makes sense, as workers want more to justify their labor if prices are rising. But today we have wages dropping over time. Yes, even though wages went up this month by 0.3%, it was all due to a one-time increase in the minimum wage. Without that government mandate wages would have been flat or falling. Look for wages to fall over the rest of the year. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

Retirement Investing in an Inflation-Deflation World

by Michael Myers on August 1, 2009

Tony and Rob Boeckh provide their insights into retirement investing in The Great Reflation Experiment: Implications for Investors. Excerpts below.

Note that they recommend investing in gold and related assets.

Link: The Boeckh Investment Letter

Pensions have been devastated and people’s appetite for risk has declined dramatically. The return on safe liquid assets ranges from 0.60% to 1.20% depending on term and withdrawal penalties. Reasonable quality bonds with a five-year maturity provide about 4%. Bonds with longer maturities have higher yields but are vulnerable to price erosion if inflationary expectations heat up. As for equities, people now understand that blue chip stocks carry huge risk. GE, once considered the ultimate “bullet proof” stock, dropped 83% in the panic, and Citigroup lost 98%. Revelations of massive fraud schemes have further damaged trust and confidence in markets.

Against this backdrop, we offer a few thoughts. First, an increase in price inflation as reflected in the CPI is a long way off. The degree of excess capacity in the world is probably the greatest since the 1930s, although excess capacity does get scrapped during recessions. Western economies will remain depressed for years and China will also be important in keeping inflation down. Its capital investment is larger than the U.S. in absolute terms. It is currently 40% of GDP and growing at 30% per annum. Profit margins in China will probably get squeezed, which, together with the huge amount of underemployed labor means that the Chinese will keep driving their export machine at full throttle, continuing to flood the world with high-quality, inexpensive goods. Therefore, investors who need income are probably safe holding reasonably high- quality bonds in the five-year maturity range. A bond ladder is a very useful tool for most people. Holdings are staggered over say, a five-year time frame and maturing bonds are invested back into five-year bonds, keeping the portfolio structure in the zero-to-five year range. In this way, some protection against a future rise in price inflation and falling bond prices can be achieved.

Second, massive monetary stimulus is good for asset prices in the near term (e.g. stocks, bonds, houses, commodities) in a world of very weak price inflation and a soft economy. That is true as long as the economy does not fall apart again, which is very unlikely given all the stimulus present and more to come if needed. Therefore, investors who can afford a little risk should own some assets that will ultimately be beneficiaries of the wall of new money being created and thrown at the economy. [click to continue…]

{ 1 comment }

The first rule of a sustainable retirement investment strategy: Prevent Big Losses.

Link: Pension insurer shifted to stocks – Boston Globe

Just months before the start of last year’s stock market collapse, the federal agency that insures the retirement funds of 44 million Americans departed from its conservative investment strategy and decided to put much of its $64 billion insurance fund into stocks.

Switching from a heavy reliance on bonds, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation decided to pour billions of dollars into speculative investments such as stocks in emerging foreign markets, real estate, and private equity funds. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

We all have beliefs about the future. Many are based on hope. Hope-based strategies for investing for a comfortable retirement might not be wise. We call that strategy buy and hope.

If you believe that we will return to a stable financial system where the stock market delivers steady, sustained growth, the Buy and Hold investment strategy is for you. If you have some doubts, read on.

Keith Fitz-Gerald at Money Morning describes how Buy and Hold failed during the financial crisis of 2008.

It was supposed be a simple proposition. Consistently put money to work in the markets, let it ride – and laugh all the way to the bank. The thinking was that you couldn’t go wrong because the markets would go up 10% to 12% a year – each and every year (It’s actually more like 4% to 6% – on average – but that’s another story for another time.

What’s important to understand is that “Buy and Hope” is the greatest myth foisted upon the American public in the last 200 years – the need for American International Group Inc.’s (AIG) retention bonuses, notwithstanding. As millions of investors have found out the hard way, the markets can – and do – frequently go through tremendous periods of readjustment.

This means that timing, as they say, really is everything. And “they” – the brokerage firms, hedge funds, ratings agencies and others that together make up “Wall Street” – don’t want you to know that. Wall Street wants you all the way into the game all the time. It doesn’t care whether you win or lose, just as long as you keep playing. So the collective “they” work together to pitch you whatever’s hot, and then move on when that investment has run its course.

And don’t even get me started about the conflicts of interest. The supposedly independent ratings agencies that rubber stamped everything from derivatives to high-grade debt have been in bed with the companies they’re supposed to be regulating for years. Consequently, millions of investors thought they had the “green light” to invest in supposedly safe institutions that have proven to be anything but during the past 24 months.

Where the rubber meets the road – especially during the down years like we’re living through now – is that the risks of outliving your money go up dramatically if you have to get out. In fact, if you achieve annualized returns of zero or less for the first five years after you retire, your odds of running out of money in the next 30 years more than double from 26% to 57%, a study from T. Rowe Price Group Inc. (TROW) reported recently.

And that’s proving to be a tough reality for millions of investors who thought they had this handled. Which is why I was not surprised to see data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute quoted in Money Magazine showing that more than 30% of near-retirees, or those in the early years of their retirement, had more than 80% of their money invested in stocks at the onset of this crisis.

Many of those investors have undoubtedly sold off assets to finance living expenses while waiting for the market to reverse. And that’s created a “double whammy” of sorts: Not only did they lose money on the way down; but those losses and the subsequent forced sales could well mean that their portfolios won’t be big enough to benefit from the next upturn when it does arrive.

Losses from Buy and Hold in a bear market reduce your potential to take advantage of an upturn. That is why every investor needs an warning system when stuff hits the fan. Investors that I know who moved to cash in the summer of 2008 are feeling very grateful now.

{ 0 comments }

Conventional Wisdom About Investing: Is It Wrong?

by Michael Myers on March 20, 2009

Scott Adams at Dilbert.com:

Almost everything I ever learned about investing turns out to be wrong. I learned that buying and holding a diversified portfolio of stocks was a sure winning strategy in the long run. So far, my lifetime stock investments are negative. I learned that the safest investment is real estate, especially in California, because “they aren’t making any more land.” That theory hasn’t worked out too well.
I learned that investing in California municipal bonds was extra safe because they were insured. That’s great until the insurance companies themselves become insolvent. 

So if everything that was good is now bad, is there any investment that we all assumed to be bad that is now good? (Other than stuffing cash under the mattress. Too obvious.)

{ 0 comments }

Repositioning Your Assets to Avoid Losses

Financial Crisis

 JT Grenough recommends a macroeconomic view of adapting to the financial crisis. You have to consider macroeconomics before you reposition your assets.  You have to reposition assets.  You have to close all major risks.  Exit the majority of money funds and currency time deposits, step up gold and oil positions, and move into non-US government [...]

Read the full article →

Baby Boomers Net Worth Falls with Home Prices

Financial Crisis

David Rosnick and Dean Baker at the Center for Economic and Policy Research released a report in February 2009 that provides a sobering picture of the retirement prospects for many baby boomers. Key excerpts are included below. Link: The Wealth of the Baby Boom Cohorts After the Collapse of the Housing Bubble  Workers have a  limited [...]

Read the full article →