From the monthly archives:

April 2009

Unsustainable pension agreements can mean no pensions at all if the provider declares bankruptcy.

If your pension provider is in financial trouble, you may not have the retirement income you had planned on.

Both private and public decision makers who pass the buck to future decision makers have created a legal and financial nightmare for all concerned.

This is an example of how the financial crisis has expanded the retirement crisis.

Link: CNNMoney, Fat Pensions Spell Doom For Many Cities

For years, politicians have been playing what amounts to a multi-trillion-dollar shell game with state and local pensions. They’ve doled out lush retiree benefits to their heavily unionized workforces, knowing that they could shove the cost for those benefits onto future generations of taxpayers.

But a recent financial bombshell dropped by a San Francisco suburb shows why that shell game is now starting to unravel in a nasty way. And it’s a cautionary tale that you can’t afford to ignore.

Here’s the skinny: In late May, Vallejo, Calif., became the largest city in California history to declare bankruptcy. Its financial demise was brought about partly by the real estate crash, which decimated home prices in the area and put a major dent in the city’s tax revenues.

… The final budget-crusher was the city’s pension plan. Thanks to retroactive benefit enhancements approved by the city council in 2000, police officers and firefighters can now retire at age 50 and receive an annual pension equal to 90% of their final pay (assuming 30 years on the job), an amount that gets increased every year to help keep pace with inflation. The old plan had given the workers a pension equal to 60% of their final pay at age 50.

So a Vallejo police sergeant making $150,000 a year can now retire at age 50 and receive an annual pension of $135,000, increased each year for inflation. To put that amount in context, you would need to amass a retirement nest egg equal to about $3.5 million to produce a similar retirement income on your own.

It wasn’t just police and firefighters who benefited from the city’s largess. The annual pensions for rank-and-file city employees were jacked up from 60% of final pay at age 55 (after a 30-year career) to a whopping 80% of pay, increased each year for inflation.

{ 2 comments }

Problems with 401k Plans discussed on 60 minutes:

  • Limited number of mediocre mutual funds for investments.
  • Numerous hidden fees erode principal.
  • 401k owners  lack investment skills to choose good investment vehicles.

Watch the video below!

[click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

The Social Security Trust Fund Surplus Is Disappearing

by Michael Myers on April 14, 2009

The viability of Social Security as a source of retirement income is fading fast. As the U.S. government drowns in debt, it is using every possible source of capital to try to maintain the illusion of stability.

You must save and invest wisely to fund your retirement. It’s hard to see how Social Security can meet its obligations when the baby boomers need it.

John Mauldin and Chris Martenson document the disturbing trend below.

Link: John Mauldin, Investor’s Insight

Everyone knows that the government spends the Social Security surpluses on current needs, “borrowing” the money and putting it into a “Social Security Trust Fund,” which is basically just US debt we owe to the trust fund. In other words, there is no trust fund with anything other than paper debt. It is accounting legerdemain.

Everyone assumed that the real problem would come sometime later next decade, when there would no longer be surpluses. In 2008, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projected there would be $703 billion in surpluses from 2009-18. Recently, the CBO has revised those estimates downward. It now projects surpluses to be only $83 billion. Here is a table that was sent to me from a blog by Chris Martensen. (http://www.chrismartenson.com) [click to continue…]

{ 1 comment }

U.S. Household Net Worth Is Declining

by Michael Myers on April 7, 2009

Retirement expert Bob Carlson  at RetirementWatch.com says that American’s perceptions of net worth affect spending and saving.

Link: The Wealth Effect, Your Portfolio, and Your Retirement

The net worth of Americans is declining. That is no secret, though the extent of the decline will surprise many. The decline has affected and will continue to affect the economy, stock market, and your portfolio. The Federal Reserve gives a picture of the net worth of Americans every quarter, in a report known as the flow of funds data, and it is worth periodically studying the report.

The report for the third quarter of 2008 (which does not include the steep declines of October and November) was an eye-opener. It also does not include the losses from the Bernie Madoff scam and other frauds that have come to light, though they are a small percentage of the total.

Here is the real eye-opener in the report. In the third quarter Americans were so alarmed by the decline in asset values that they actually reduced their debts. This has not occurred since the data were first reported in 1952. In the third quarter, household borrowing, mortgages, and consumer credit fell at a $117.4 billion annual rate. Granted, that is a drop in the bucket compared to the asset values and amount of debt outstanding. But it does show a significant change in Americans’ behavior and thinking. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }

The first rule of a sustainable retirement investment strategy: Prevent Big Losses.

Link: Pension insurer shifted to stocks – Boston Globe

Just months before the start of last year’s stock market collapse, the federal agency that insures the retirement funds of 44 million Americans departed from its conservative investment strategy and decided to put much of its $64 billion insurance fund into stocks.

Switching from a heavy reliance on bonds, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation decided to pour billions of dollars into speculative investments such as stocks in emerging foreign markets, real estate, and private equity funds. [click to continue…]

{ 0 comments }